When a channel is mis-assigned on a video, you have to do *nochannel then add the other ones all back on one by one. Wouldn't it be easier to do *nocomedy or *nomusic instead? I'm sure this was asked before, but I'm sure as hell not looking through the sift talk posts and I also can see no benefit to the current system.
Newest Channel Talk Posts
1. I read motel reviews on the internet for entertainment. (Geek Talk)
2. RIAA confirms it's behind the Muxtape shutdown (Rocknroll Talk)
3. My question to atheists: Why fruit? (Science Talk)
4. Man Admits to Beating Pastor with Air Hose (Religion Talk)
5. Hack Your Wii for Applications and DVD Playback (Videogames Talk)
6. Pronunciation Poem. (Books Talk)
7. Lousy connection to one youtube cluster (Geek Talk)
8. Seinfeld and Celebrity Computer Endorsements (History Talk)
9. Sift's music lovahs - unite! (Music Talk)
10. Oh thank baby Jesus (Wheels Talk)
Subscribe
Video Hosts
We accept video submissions from the below hosts. If your favorite video provider is not available, please contact us to suggest it.
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
VideoSift Friends & Partners
Useful Pages
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
Current Users
1. greengiant5
2. Asmo
3. balabing
4. vermeulen
5. R0SENCRANTZ
6. BoneyD
7. lighthouse
9. dag
10. joedirt
11. jeromko
12. ex-jedi
13. Lithic
14. srd
15. wildsnaps
16. moodonia
17. NicoleBee
18. FishBulb
19. thinker247
20. Aemaeth
21. CamW
22. Issykitty
23. Ghostly
24. Sylvester_Ink
26. chilaxe
27. GDGD
28. westy
"The Serenity of Nature video collection (*nature)"
"The Clouds and Beyond (*spacy)"
and so on.
The reverse *nomusic sounds like a good idea.
(or for the time being *nochannel)
I'd give you *quality, but I got no powa.
Aside - that channel close tag in my comment above is weird. I didn't write it. Does the comment system now automatically insert a closing tag if one isn't found to match a previous tag? That's pretty cool.
If it is too much coding, then never mind.
yeah, I was basically making an educated guess on how much coding it would take. If it is more than an hour's worth of work, it's probably not worth it.
I just thought it would be easier than this. Also, the current system is so strange, it boggles my mind to think of why they established that in the first place.
It probably has to do with the fact that most channels started out as collectives in the old system. Vids could only be in one collective, and I think once a vid was added to a collective, it couldn't be removed except by the collective owner, not by invocation.